TradingView is a financial visualization and charting platform that provides traders and investors with advanced tools to analyze financial markets. It supports multiple asset classes, including stocks, forex, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and indices. Both retail and professional traders widely use the platform for market research, technical analysis, and social trading.
Definition:
An active user on TradingView is someone who has realized the core value proposition of the product at least once by actively engaging with its tools whether it’s using an advanced chart, setting up alerts, or engaging with the community for market insights.
“User has created or interacted with at least one customized trading setup that enhances their decision-making within 7 days of creating a account.”
An active TradingView user is someone who has used at least one of its core analytical or trading tools to enhance their decision-making. The activation moment happens when a user customizes a trading setup, sets alerts, or engages with the platform’s interactive features.
ICP | ICP 1 | ICP 2 | ICP 3 | ICP 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter / Context | Free User (Retail Trader & Investor) | Active Retail Trader (Swing & Intraday) | Professional Trader & Investor | Market Educator & Content Creator |
Persona | Retail trader who maximizes free features | Trades regularly and needs better real-time data | Full-time trader or wealth manager | Traders who educate and create content |
Segmentation | Casual User | Core User | Core User | Power User |
Age | 22-35 | 25-45 | 30-55 | 28-50 |
Occupation | Aspiring traders, working professionals, college students | IT professionals, bankers, self-employed individuals | Full-time traders, portfolio managers, proprietary traders | Trading educators, YouTubers, influencers |
Trading Experience | Beginner to intermediate | Intermediate to advanced | Advanced (5+ years) | Intermediate to advanced |
Market Interest | Stocks, cryptocurrencies, options | Equities, forex, commodities, options | Stocks, forex, commodities, indices, options, futures | Stocks, forex, crypto, commodities |
Budget | ₹0 (prefers free resources) | ₹500-₹2000 per month | ₹2000-₹5000 per month | ₹1500-₹4000 per month |
Primary Goal | Learn trading, analyze charts, follow market trends | Execute better trades with technical analysis | Optimize trading strategies & execution | Create content, teach trading, engage audience |
Preferred Trading Style | Swing trading, positional trading | Intraday, swing trading | Algorithmic, options, futures trading | Long-term investing, swing trading |
Time Spent on TradingView (Daily) | 30-60 minutes | 1-3 hours | 4-8 hours | 2-4 hours |
Most Used Features | Basic charting, free indicators, community ideas | Multiple chart layouts, alerts, custom indicators | Pine Script, advanced backtesting, multi-screen setup | Chart publishing, trade idea sharing, video overlays |
Biggest Pain Point | Delayed market data, limited saved layouts | Delayed alerts, limitations in real-time data | Broker API integration, historical data limitations | Limited branding, exposure in TradingView community |
Alternative Platforms Considered | Zerodha Kite, Investing.com, Moneycontrol | MetaTrader, ThinkorSwim, Upstox Pro | Bloomberg Terminal, MetaTrader, Trading Technologies | Investing.com, YouTube, Discord Trading Groups |
Decision-Making Factor for Premium Plan | Affordable pricing, more alerts & layouts | Real-time data, custom indicators, advanced alerts | API access, ultra-low latency data, advanced scripting | Increased visibility, branding tools, premium publishing options |
Likelihood to Upgrade (Low/Medium/High) | Low | Medium | High | Medium to High |
For TradingView, users vary significantly in their level of engagement—some may log in occasionally to check market trends, while others rely on the platform daily for critical trading decisions. By segmenting users based on behavior (Casual, Core, Power Users), we can personalize pricing, upsell relevant features, and optimize retention strategies.
Segmentation | Features Used | Natural Frequency |
---|---|---|
Casual Users | Basic charting, free indicators, community trade ideas | 1-3 times a week (Occasionally) |
Core Users | Multiple chart layouts, alerts, and custom Scripts. | Multiple times a week (Regularly) |
Power Users | Pine Script, advanced back testing, multi-screen setup. | Multiple times a day (Heavily) |
For Litmus test in Monetization - We will look into 3 Factors
1: Retention Curve
2: Depth of Engagement
3: Willingness to Pay
While specific retention rates for TradingView are not publicly disclosed, we can infer potential benchmarks by examining industry standards. Based on industry benchmarks and the finance app retention data from Adjust (Refer to the below Image) , we can estimate that TradingView’s 30-day retention rate is approximately 12%. This assumption is derived from the stock trading category in the provided chart, which shows that similar financial tools see a gradual drop-off in user engagement over time.
For the above assumptions - Let's have a look at Retention curve for TradingView
Before we get into Depth of Engagement - Let's analyze the primary framework for Engagement
User Type | Primary Engagement Behavior | Time Spent Per Session | Number of Features Used Per Session | Key Engagement Actions | Likelihood to Convert to Paid User | Friction Points (Why They Drop Off) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Casual User | Logs in occasionally, checks charts but doesn’t set alerts or engage deeply. | 5-10 minutes per session | Basic charting, occasional indicators. | Checks stock trends, reads market news, may view trade ideas. | Low | No strong habit formation, finds free version enough. |
Core User | Uses TradingView daily, relies on alerts, multiple chart layouts, technical indicators. | 20-40 minutes per session | Uses multiple indicators, alerts, layouts, community ideas. | Sets price alerts, saves chart layouts, engages with trade ideas. | Medium to High | Needs more real-time data, wants better integration with trading accounts. |
Power User | Uses TradingView as their primary trading tool, deeply customizes charts and scripts. | 60+ minutes per session | Advanced scripting, broker API, multi-screen charting. | Creates Pine Script indicators, integrates with broker API, shares insights. | Very High | Requires institutional-grade speed, more automation, better customer support. |
Users will be willing to pay for TradingView when:
User Type | Willingness to Pay | Reasoning | Key Features They Would Pay For | Expected Pricing Sweet Spot (₹ per month) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Casual User | Low | Prefers free features, trades occasionally, does not see enough value in premium tools. | Limited—might pay for ad-free experience or occasional premium access. | ₹0 - ₹500 |
Core User | Medium to High | Trades regularly, needs real-time data, alerts, and saved layouts to improve trading efficiency. | Real-time data, custom alerts, multiple chart layouts, Pine Script customization. | ₹1000 - ₹2500 |
Power User | Very High | Uses TradingView as a core tool, requires scripting, broker integrations, and full data access. | Broker API integrations, deep historical data, unlimited scripting, premium support. | ₹2500 - ₹5000+ |
👉 Reasoning:
👉 Reasoning:
👉 Reasoning :
🎯 Goal: Increase conversion rate from free users to paid subscribers.
📌 Hypothesis: Users who experience premium features for a short period will be more likely to convert to a paid plan.
🛠️ Execution:
How to Measure the success:
✅ Conversion Rate to Paid Plan (Benchmark: 8-12% conversion).
✅ % of users who engage with premium features during trial.
✅ Churn rate post-conversion (Are they sticking after the trial ends?).
🎯 Goal: Capture revenue from users who don’t want full subscriptions but are willing to pay for specific premium tools.
📌 Hypothesis: Users hesitant to subscribe will pay for one-time access to premium features if offered at a reasonable cost.
🛠️ Execution:
How to Measure the success:
✅ Revenue from one-time purchases.
✅ % of users who later upgrade to a full subscription after trying premium features.
🎯 Goal: Move Pro and Pro+ users to higher-tier Premium & Institutional plans.
📌 Hypothesis: Users who frequently use core features will upgrade if given exclusive benefits tailored to their needs.
🛠️ Execution:
How to Measure the success:
✅ % of users upgrading to higher-tier plans.
Category | User Pain Point / Problem | Why It’s a Problem? |
---|---|---|
Limited Charting Capabilities | Broker-provided charts (Zerodha, Upstox) have limited tools, fewer indicators, and poor UI. | Traders need better visualizations for accurate decision-making. |
Lack of Real-Time Market Data | Free tools (Investing.com, Yahoo Finance) provide delayed data. | Intraday & swing traders need instant price updates for precise entries/exits. |
Scattered Trading Workflow | Traders switch between multiple tools—charts, alerts, news, community insights —across different platforms. | Leads to inefficiency, missed trades, and poor decision-making |
No Personalization & Automation | Default settings don’t allow deep customization. Most tools don’t support custom scripts & alerts | Professional traders & algo traders need tailored setups. |
Lack of Trade Validation & Learning | No easy way to backtest strategies or validate technical analysis. | Traders can’t improve or learn from past mistakes effectively |
No Social Trading Community | Most tools don’t offer collaborative learning or trade idea sharing. | New traders lack mentorship while experts can’t showcase credibility. |
TradingView stands out because it solves multiple pain points under one platform. Here’s how:
Core Value Proposition | Problem It Solves | Outcomes for Users |
---|---|---|
Advanced & Intuitive Charting | Eliminates the limited UI & tools of broker-based charts | Faster, clearer technical analysis → Better trade accuracy. |
Real-Time Market Data (Premium Feature) | Solves delayed price updates in free tools | Never miss a trading opportunity → Improved execution. |
All-in-One Trading Platform | Removes scattered workflow across multiple apps | Saves time switching between apps → More efficiency. |
Custom Alerts & Pine Script Automation | Replaces manual monitoring with smart automation | Less manual work → Smarter trading, better risk management. |
Back testing & Strategy Testing | Fixes the lack of trade validation tools | Less manual work → Smarter trading, better risk management. |
Social Trading & Community Insights | Adds a collaborative learning ecosystem for traders. | Better learning, access to expert insights → More confidence in trades. |
TradingView’s strength isn’t just that it’s a charting platform—it’s that it solves inefficiencies across the entire trading workflow.
✅ For casual traders → Makes trading easy & accessible.
✅ For core traders → Enhances decision-making with data, alerts, & automation.
✅ For professional traders → Provides institutional-grade customization & execution tools.
If users don’t use TradingView, they still have alternative ways to achieve their goals of technical analysis, market tracking, and trade execution. Based on different user segments, they would:
User Type | Alternative Ways to Get Their Desired Outcome |
---|---|
Casual Users | Use free broker-provided charting tools (Zerodha Kite, Upstox, Angel One). |
Core Users | Use MetaTrader (MT4/MT5), Investing.com for advanced charting. |
Power Users | Use Bloomberg Terminal, Trading Technologies, Python-based back testing tools. |
While substitutes exist, most lack the combination of real-time data, advanced tools, and community insights that TradingView offers.
Users don’t just pay for charting—they pay for speed, accuracy, confidence, and time savings in their trading journey.
TradingView has two approaches to decide who to charge:
✅ Best Approach: Hybrid of Both (Casual/Core/Power + RFM Segmentation)
We start with Core and Power users but use RFM analysis to identify the best moment to upsell them.
User Segment | Monetization Approach |
---|---|
Casual Users (Low Recency, Low Frequency, Low Monetary) | Keep them on freemium, provide occasional monetization nudges via market alerts or feature teasers. |
Core Users (Medium to High Recency & Frequency, Low Monetary) | Target them with subscription-based monetization (Pro/Pro+ plans). Focus on real-time data, alerts, multi-layouts. |
Power Users (High Recency, High Frequency, Medium to High Monetary) | Push premium monetization (Pro+ & API integrations), offer institutional-level features & pricing tiers. |
User Type | Recency (How Recently Used?) | Frequency (How Often Used?) | Monetary (Willingness to Pay?) | Expected Churn Rate if Charged | Expected Revenue Gain |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Casual Users | Low (Occasionally uses TradingView) | Low (Few times per month) | Low (Relies on free version) | High churn (50-70%) → Not ready to pay yet | Minimal (Might pay for one-time features like day access to premium) |
Core Users | Medium (Uses TradingView regularly) | Medium to High (Daily or weekly use) | Medium (Open to paying for better tools) | Moderate churn (20-40%) → Some will upgrade, others will drop off | Good revenue growth if charged a fair amount (₹1000-₹2500/month) |
Power Users | High (Uses TradingView daily) | High (Multiple times per day) | High (TradingView is essential to workflow) | Low churn (5-10%) → They need premium features | Very High → Can be charged ₹2500-₹5000/month, maximizing LTV |
✅ Charge Champions & Loyal Customers first → They have the lowest churn and highest revenue potential.
✅ Convert Potential Loyalists into paid users → Use time-sensitive offers, premium trials, and feature limitations.
Before getting into Perceived Price Let's take a look at the user flow of TradingView?
What type of perceived value does TradingView hold?
What is TradingView’s perceived value against competition?
Why does TradingView have an edge over competitors?
How much benefit does TradingView offer in monetary gains?
Users compare TradingView’s pricing against:
1️: Alternative solutions (MetaTrader, Bloomberg, Investing.com, free broker charts).
2️: Their own ROI (Return on Investment) → Will this tool help them make or save money?
3️: Feature limitations in the free version → Are the premium features essential for their trading success?
User Type | What They Think About Price? | How to Justify the Price? |
---|---|---|
Casual Users (Free Users) | "I can use free broker charts, why should I pay?" | Offer one-time purchases for premium indicators & limited-time access to real-time data. |
Core Users (Swing & Intraday Traders) | "If TradingView helps me make better trades, it's worth it." | Emphasize time savings, better decision-making, and strategy automation |
Power Users (Professional Traders & Analysts) | "I need a reliable tool with no compromises." | Justify institutional-grade features, Pine Script automation, and API access as an investment, not a cost. |
Charge users when:
✅ Perceived Value > Perceived Price.
✅ The user has hit a limitation in the free tier that directly impacts their trading workflow.
✅ Time Spent & Engagement Levels Indicate Dependency (Frequent logins, saved layouts, active alerts).
⏳ Inflection Point = Perceived Value + Time > Perceived Price
✔ Don’t charge too early—let users experience perceived value first.
✔ Power users will convert fastest, core users need nudges, and casuals need habit formation.
✔ Use free-tier limitations as a natural upsell point to monetize effectively.
Our What to charge for will depend on the type of user and also the core value proposition they realized.
What is Their Core Value Proposition?
What Would They Be Willing to Pay More For?
✅ Live market data (faster execution, no lag).
✅ Advanced alerts & custom indicators to improve trade accuracy.
✅ More saved layouts & multi-screen functionality for easier tracking.
✅ Ad-free experience to keep the platform clean & focused.
How Should We Charge Them?
Subscription-Based Pricing (Time + Access Model)
Why this works?
What is Their Core Value Proposition?
What Would They Be Willing to Pay More For?
✅ Pine Script API access to create custom indicators & strategies.
✅ Broker API integration to place trades directly from TradingView.
✅ Exclusive backtesting tools for validating strategies.
✅ Premium support & dedicated account managers.
How Should We Charge Them?
Access-Based + Shareability & Outcome-Based Pricing
Why this works?
What is Their Core Value Proposition?
What Would They Be Willing to Pay More For?
✅ One-time premium access (e.g., pay ₹99 for real-time data for a day).
✅ Limited-time access to premium indicators (pay ₹199/month for advanced tools).
✅ Educational content & market insights (pay-per-use model).
How Should We Charge Them?
Pay-Per-Use + Free-Tier Model
Why this works?
User Type | Pricing Model | What to Charge For? |
---|---|---|
Core Users | Subscription (Time + Access Model) | Real-time data, alerts, indicators, multi-layouts |
Power Users | Access-Based + Shareability & Outcome-Based Pricing | API, automation, broker integrations, premium support |
Casual Users | Pay-Per-Use + Free-Tier Model | One-time feature access (real-time data, indicators) |
(Do your own math and build 2-3 different pricing strategies and maximize your revenue)
Users can discover TradingView's pricing information through various sections and interactions on the platform:
Does it have 3 Pricing Strategy? - Yes
Does it have Scratching Effect? - No it doesn't have scratching effect but if does offer additional discount on Annual Plans and highlights the amount saved.
Does it have Ownership Effect? - Yes, users can try any plan for 30days
Does it have Price Anchoring? - Yes, users can compare on the basis of features.
Surround Effect or Bundling? - Yes, TradingView Not just provides one market, but different global markets data
Borrowing Trust Effect? - Yes, it does show Social proofing numbers and also snips of professional traders (influencers) using TradingView
System Design? - System 2 Design
While most of TradingView's core engagement relies on System 2 thinking, certain elements trigger fast, emotional decision-making (System 1):
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore courses by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Course
Advanced Growth Strategy
Core principles to distribution, user onboarding, retention & monetisation.
58 modules
21 hours
Abhishek
GrowthX
Udayan
GrowthX
Members Only
Course
Brand Led Growth
Design your brand wedge & implement it across every customer touchpoint.
15 modules
2 hours
Swati Mohan
Ex-CMO | Netflix India
Members Only
Course
Creative Strategy
Build a solid creative strategy that fuels brand growth and drives real, measurable business impact.
10 modules
2 hours
Ashwath Swaminathan
Ex-CGMO | Swiggy
Members Only
Course
Storytelling
Learn the art & science of crafting stories that create emotional connect and drive business impact
12 modules
2 hours
Apoorv Sharma
Marketing leader | Apple
Members Only
Course
Data Led Growth
Learn the science of RCA & experimentation design to drive real revenue impact.
12 modules
2 hours
Tanmay Nagori
Head of Analytics | Tide
Members Only
Course
Event Led Growth
Design an end to end strategy to create events that drive revenue growth.
48 modules
1 hour
Nishchal Dua
VP Marketing | inFeedo AI
Members Only
Course
Partnership Led Growth
Design product integrations & channel partnerships to drive revenue impact.
27 modules
1 hour
Ashutosh Cheulkar
Product Growth | Jisr
Members Only
Course
Tech for Growth
Learn to ship better products with engineering & take informed trade-offs.
14 modules
2 hours
Jagan B
Product Leader | Razorpay
Members Only
Course
Growth Model Design
Learn how to break down your North Star metric into actionable input levers and prioritise them.
9 modules
1 hour
Abhishek Patil
Co-founder | GrowthX
Members Only
Course
Building Growth Teams
Learn how to design your team blueprint, attract, hire & retain great talent
24 modules
1 hour
Udayan Walvekar
Co-founder | GrowthX
Members Only
Crack a new job or a promotion with ELEVATE
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.